The Ugly Sisters
As I walked from Celtic Park towards the Gallowgate after
last week’s Glasgow derby I could already hear the familiar sounds of sirens
drifting on the chilly December air. These games bring out the worst in some
and often there are more problems among those who watched the game in pubs and
clubs than from the fans actually at the match. Scotland’s relationship with
alcohol has long been a cause for concern but when mixed with the emotions a
Celtic- Rangers match engenders then it can lead to problems.
The game itself wasn’t pretty to watch especially if you are
a Celtic supporter. Rangers rightly edged a dour struggle marked by niggling
fouls and a lot of nervous tension. We saw accusations of ‘racist’ abuse hurled
at Alfredo Morelos although evidence of this has yet to be shown. One video
shared around social media showed Morelos making cut throat gestures towards
Celtic supporters as irate punters gave him a lot of verbal abuse. Among the
terms clearly audible were ‘Hun bastard’
and ‘Orange bastard’ and Celtic
supporters shouldn’t hide away from these facts. There was no discernible
racist name calling but the terms used were nonetheless ugly in their own
right. Ryan Kent also made an unsavoury gesture towards Celtic fans after
scoring his goal to add to an already tense occasion. Supporters on both sides
were struck with coins and the predictable songs were given an airing by an
away support with seemingly few songs about football in their repertoire.
There has been much bleating from Rangers FC about treating
their players with respect on and off the field. Their silence when it’s their
supporters abusing people like Neil Lennon was noticeable. The abuse Morelos
receives is despicable at times and should be condemned by any fair minded
person but few will be taking lessons in morality from a club with Rangers’
history.
For some people the spectacle, passion, noise and sheer
visceral tribalism of these matches make them the highlight of their season. I
know a good few folk who love these occasions especially as Celtic have been
fairly dominant over the past decade. For others they are ugly, clannish
confrontations which they are not enamoured with at all. Whatever you feel
about the Glasgow derby it is certainly box office and you could have sold last
week’s game out twice over. No comparable country of Scotland’s size can boast
two clubs which attract such huge support and the historical genesis of what
was once called the ‘Old Firm’ has probably been a mixed blessing for Scottish
football. They bring revenue, interest
and at least historically, a modicum of respect in European football but that
comes at a sporting and, some would argue, social cost.
Their domination of the Scottish game is such that no other
club has won the title since 1985. That is to say no one under 40 will have
much memory of Aberdeen’s league triumph that year. Of the 123 Scottish top
league titles since the inception of the league in 1890, the big two have won
105 titles. That is an incredible 85% of Scottish titles won by two clubs and
that sort of domination is not healthy for the Scottish game. Their domination
in the cup competitions is less pronounced given the one off nature of cup ties
but they are both still streets ahead of the competition in these competitions;
Celtic have won the Scottish Cup 39 times and Rangers 33. Given the fact that
these two big clubs are portrayed as polar opposites in terms of the political,
historical and cultural baggage which surrounds them it is all the more intense
when they meet.
It isn’t unusual for big teams to dominate in smaller
countries; for instance Portugal’s big three (Porto, Sporting CP and Benfica)
have won every championship apart from on two occasions. (1946 and 2001) In
Scotland it must remain galling for smaller Scottish clubs to watch busloads of
fans leave their towns and head to Glasgow to watch the big two.
St Johnstone, a side whose average attendance has hovered
around 4000 for the past few years announced this week that it will allow
visiting Celtic and Rangers fans to occupy three of the four stands at their
stadium when they play there. This is common sense from a financial point of
view as the sight of 3 or 4 thousand empty seats is neither gratifying nor
sensible. Their stadium with a capacity of 10,696 will thus host around 7000
away fans for those matches and their fans response was mixed. One said online,
‘Aye, let the ugly sisters fill the lot.
We put up with their songs so we might as well take their money.’ That
feeling that aspects of the culture surrounding Celtic and Rangers are negative,
even alien, influences in Scottish football is shared by a lot of supporters of
other clubs. Both are lumped together as the ‘gruesome twosome’ in the
opinion of many.
It’s often interesting to see ourselves as others see us.
Consider Celtic and Rangers supporters pitching up in your local town for a
game twice each season. The crowd and atmosphere they bring might lend an air
of excitement but some of the songs they sing have precious little to do with
football. The players they can afford will more often than not be too good for
your team although there’s always a chance in a game of football. Some argue
Scottish football would be better without the Glasgow clubs and one newspaper
used to print a league table ‘minus the Old Firm’ during the time it was
thought they’d be heading for the English game. Others suggest Scottish
football without them would become like the League of Ireland although given
there is no major GAA sports in Scotland that is highly unlikely. Teams like
Aberdeen, Hibs and Hearts competing for titles would certainly fill their
stadiums.
How do we make our game more competitive? In days past when
most fans paid at the gate the money was split with the visiting club on a
50-50 basis. Those times are unlikely to return. One aspect which could be
changed is pooling all revenues from TV and distributing to clubs equally
rather than basing the amount received on league position. It is a fact of life
that there is a food chain in football and the bigger clubs will pay more to
attract the best players and thus continue to dominate. Scotland is unlikely to
see a side out-with Celtic and Rangers win the title unless a rich benefactor
buys into one of our better clubs. We saw the high hopes Hearts had with
Vladimir Romanov but that dream faded quickly. It could be that the 35 years
without a club out-with Celtic and Rangers winning the league could stretch to 45 or even 55 years
and much as I love my club being successful that would be a tragedy for our
game.
So these two clubs could be locked in their loveless embrace
for the foreseeable future and the rest of Scottish football will just have to
accept it?
No comments:
Post a Comment