More than
a club?
Celtic’s AGM certainly caused a storm on
social media yesterday with the two hot topics being the club’s continuing
refusal to seek accreditation as a living wage employer and the ongoing row
over Director Ian Livingston’s political affiliations. For some supporters the
fact Celtic was refusing to sign up to the living wage scheme (despite actually
paying their full time employees the living wage at the moment) was bad enough
but to then have a Director seemingly in favour of cuts to Tax credits which
would hit the poorest workers in the land compounded this. The Celtic board no
doubt has its reasons for the stances they take but they continue to be poor at
explaining those reasons to the supporters. The Living wage issue seems to be
more about ensuring the club forces contractors such as catering and stewarding
companies to pay their employees the prerequisite amount per hour. The club
should surely state publically that while they have no power to force other
companies to adjust pay rates of their workers, they can at least negotiate the
point when contracts are up for renewal.
Most of us feel that paying low paid workers
the living wage is the right thing to do and Celtic talk proudly in their Mission
statement of striving to be the ‘team of
the people.’ with a ‘wider role and
the responsibility of being a major Scottish social institution promoting
health, well-being and social integration.’ If that is to be anything more
than empty talk then part of it should be about fighting for the poorest
workers in our society and doing so publically. Health and well-being are,
after all, often affected by low income.
That point isn’t lost on many who see the
plans by the Conservative party to cut Tax Credits as another assault on the
poorest workers in society and some at the AGM raised the role of Lord
Livingston as a Tory Peer in this context. They are quite entitled to question
the board on this issue although the balance of power among shareholders means
that they were always unlikely to affect the board’s position that Lord
Livingston brings considerable business experience and acumen to Celtic and his
political views are not a consideration when deciding to confirm his position
as a director of Celtic. This may tie into the club’s stated policy of having ‘no political agenda’ but it did cause
some anger amongst a vociferous group among the support which was further
exacerbated by Chairman Ian Bankier’s description of some of the abuse aimed at
Lord Livingston as ‘Criminally racist.’
He said that Mr Livingston had been…
‘Subject to a torrent of utterly base personal abuse conducted over social
media over recent weeks. The messages posted, in quite a few cases are
criminally racist and in all cases the vocabulary chosen is base and highly abusive
and what sickens me to the core is that the campaign is conducted in the name
of (Celtic founder) Brother Walfrid.’
Powerful stuff from the
Celtic Chairman and his words predictably set off a chain reaction on social
media which had those who it seemed didn’t read his actual words
misinterpreting them as a slur on all Celtic supporters. There were numerous
comments on Twitter which gave the impression the Chairman’s ‘criminally racist’ comments were aimed
at more than the foul mouthed minority who certainly did use extreme and
abusive language about Ian Livingston. Mr Bankier then felt obliged to release
a statement denying his comments were directed to the wider Celtic support and
said…
‘Already there has been some media coverage of my comments relating to Ian
Livingston and his proposed re-appointment and much of it has been wildly
exaggerated or taken out of context. I have not branded our supporters racist
and it is outrageous to suggest that I would ever do that. I was only referring
to a small number of specific comments which have been made on social media,
which I believe are unacceptable, and I know Celtic supporters would agree with
me.’
In this instance Ian
Bankier is correct. A small number of comments I have read from Facebook and
Twitter have been contemptable in their tone and we fail in our duty as Celtic
supporters if we don’t let the people who say such things know that it’s
unacceptable. I am not for an instant defending Ian Livingston’s politics but I
will defend his right to hold beliefs which differ from mine without him being
called an ‘Ashkenazi
cunt’ or a ‘Dirty Zionist fucker’ and I’m sure 99.9%
of Celtic supporters would agree with me on that. I won’t embarrass the people
who made these comments by naming them but they are genuine. Such intolerance
is not the Celtic way and I know that the vast majority of Celtic supporters
would argue passionately about issues affecting the club without ever stooping
so low.
It
remains laudable that so many Celtic supporters feel so strongly about social
issues affecting our poorest people. Today’s foodbank collection at the stadium
will be yet another demonstration of that basic decency to be found among them.
It is only right that they challenge the club to live up to its founding
principles but it is also important that supporters challenge those among our
number who over step the mark.
If you’re going to the game today remember to
take what you can afford along to the foodbank collection points. Perhaps as
our Directors gaze out of the window and see the spirit of Walfrid alive and
well among the support they will think again about ensuring all who work at the
great man’s club are paid enough to live on. We claim to be more than a club, I
hope we’re more than just a business.
Thank you. I have been concerned by the Board commenting regarding 'racist' attacks on the noble Lord. I agree 100% that real Celtic supporters do not and will not use racial attacks as justification for their opposition to the Board. I want to see Celtic become a Living Wage employer but I will not accept that those who are unhappy about it have the right to attack the position of others who may disagree. I am certainly not a Tory and despise their attack on the working class of this country. They were however elected to take those sort of decisions. If we don't like it then tough. The people of Scotland had their chance to do something about it and decided that they would rather accept the Status Quo. As they say - it's your bed, you lie in it.
ReplyDelete