Watching
news filter through that the Argentinian football side had decided not to play
a game in Israel this week reminded me yet again of the impossibility of
totally separating sport from politics. The disgracefully callous treatment of
Palestinians on the ‘great march of return’
demonstrations was one of the key factors which led to pressure being brought
to bear on Argentina who announced that they would not fulfill the fixture. It
was for some, including many Palestinians, a sign that at least some in the
world cared about their plight, For others it was another example of pressure
being brought to bear unfairly on a football team merely out to play a game. It
got me thinking about another game of football long ago which did take place
and perhaps never should have.
In
September 1973 as Celtic drove relentlessly towards another league title,
events were occurring on the other side of the world which would eventually
impact on Scotland and our national game. The left leaning Chilean Popular
Unity Party led by Salvador Allende was swept from power in a CIA backed coup
led by the Chilean military and General Augusto Pinochet. It was a brutal
seizure of power which saw Chilean jets bombing their own Presidential Palace
as troops and tanks flooded the streets. The round-up of Allende supporters
began immediately and thousands of political opponents were arrested, tortured
and in many cases murdered. Among them was folk singer and poet, Victor Jara.
Jara’s
songs had urged the people to build a better, fairer country and there was no
doubting his support for Allende. This was enough for him to be arrested and
taken to the Chilean national football stadium where he was held with thousands
of others. When he was recognised by the soldiers, he was taken to the changing
room and brutally tortured. His hands and fingers were smashed with an axe as
the guards mocked him and asked that he play his guitar for them. One of the
officers loaded a single bullet into a gun and spun the chamber; he then played
Russian Roulette with the gun pressed to Jara’s head until eventually it went
off and Victor fell. He ordered two young conscripts to finish him and they
fired over 40 bullets into Jara’s body.
In the aftermath of the bloodletting at the national stadium in Santiago, the USSR team was due to play a world cup play-off match. They refused to go there and their spokesman said….
‘The Football Federation of the USSR has
asked FIFA to hold the match in a third country as the stadium in Santiago is
stained with the blood of Chilean patriots. Soviet sportsmen cannot at this
time perform at such a venue on moral grounds.’
FIFA
sent officials to the stadium which was still holding prisoners who were cowed
and out of sight. FIFA ordered the USSR to play the game which of course they
refused. This led to the bizarre spectacle of Chile kicking off a game against
an absent opposition and scoring a ‘goal’ against team which was sitting at
home 8000 miles away.
Over
7000 men and women had been held in dreadful conditions in the stadium and many
of them were brutalised and murdered. Yet just a few short years after these
events, the SFA decided in their wisdom to play a football match against
Pinochet’s Chile in that same stadium. There was huge outcry in Scotland from
fans, political groups, trade unions and church groups. Indeed engineers at the
Rolls Royce factory in East Kilbride refused to repair engines of planes from
the Chilean air force. An act of solidarity recalled this year in the excellent
documentary, ‘Nae Pasaran.’ The SFA though
were having none of it and pushed ahead with the match which was part of the
build up to the World Cup in Argentina. Many players thought that refusal to go
to Chile might jeopardise their chances of going to the world cup the following
year. Alan Rough, the Scottish goalkeeper of the time, said later…
“When I went
into that stadium, I remember going into the dressing room and I remember
seeing the bullet holes on the wall where they had lined up people and killed
them. I think if we had been given more information, that there were actually
people still being killed and still being arrested on the street and being
taken away and shot most of the players wouldn’t have gone.”
Scotland won their ‘Shame game’ in Santiago by 4 goals to 2 but the bitterness and controversy lingered on. Had Scotland cancelled the match it would have been seen by many as an act of solidarity with the oppressed and won Scotland many friends. At least the controversy the game caused raised awareness about what was going on in Chile but for many football fans, it was a game which should never have taken place.
Those
of you who remember the sporting boycott of South Africa during the Apartheid
era will know that it was of the most visual and potent weapons used to
highlight the injustices there. In 1963 FIFA suspended South Africa and when
FIFA President Stanley Rous went to negotiate with the South African FA, they
asked if they could field and all white side at the 1966 World Cup in England
and an all black side in the 1970 tournament in Mexico. FIFA rightly shook
their head in disbelief and walked away. In the end, political, economic and
sporting pressures built up leading South Africa to abandon Apartheid and
become a more integrated and fairer society.
There
are those who would apply similar pressure to Israel. Scotland is due to play
in Israel in October as part of the European Nations League fixtures. There
will undoubtedly be pressure put on the SFA by some not to go there,
particularly if the brutality goes on, but it is highly unlikely they’ll even
consider not going. The match, unlike the friendly in Chile in 1977, is a
competitive, UEFA sanctioned game and not going would leave Scotland open to punitive
sanctions. In fairness though, Celtic has played in Israel against Hapoel Be’er
Sheva and Hapoel Tel Aviv in the past and there was little call for any boycotts
then. Pragmatism and an unwillingness to face the wrath of UEFA ensured those
ties went ahead. Politics and sport will never be totally separated but they
are uncomfortable bed-fellows.
Victor
Jara was asked by a Journalist just a few days before the Coup which was to
claim his life, what love meant to him. He replied…
‘Love
of my home, my wife and my children. Love for the earth that helps me live. Love
for education and of work. Love of others who work for the common good. Love of
justice as the instrument that provides equilibrium for human dignity. Love of
peace in order to enjoy one's life. Love of freedom, but not the freedom
acquired at the expense of others’ freedom, but rather the freedom of all.‘
Few would disagree with those words. Some in our world though
still take their freedom at the expense of others. Until such injustices end there
will always be protests; there will always be those who won’t look the other
way.
That is a matter for each human being’s conscience and I for one won’t condemn those
who say, that’s enough, no more!
No comments:
Post a Comment