The
unwritten rule
It is a matter of record that a largely
compliant media went along with the dreams and schemes of the David Murray
years at Ibrox with barely an alarm raised about the huge bubble of
unsustainable debt which was funding the whole charade. Of course as we can all
see clearly now the financial crash of 2008 led to banks refusing to lend to
high risk companies and the cracks began to appear in the edifice. Journalist Graham Spiers warned at the time
that…
‘Murray’s
stewardship the club racked up domestic trophies while, even better, Celtic
were on the ropes. At one point in 2003, Rangers’ net debt reached £82m, but
the figure appeared in small print in the club’s accounts and few lost any
sleep over it. Rangers in this period made successive annual losses of £19m,
£32m and £29m – staggering in the context of Scottish football.’
Despite this, Tore Andre Flo was bought for
£12m in 2000 and the balloon of debt was inflated to bursting point. On top of
this many of the highly paid players and staff were enlisted onto the morally
repugnant tax avoidance scheme known to one as all as ‘EBTs,’ as if they didn’t
earn enough. We mere mortals paid our dues to support public services and those
with the broadest shoulders shirked responsibility and dodged their taxes.
Spiers warnings about the debt bubble at Ibrox were dismissed as the ravings of
a man who had some sort of agenda against Rangers.
If the
debt issue was an area where Spiers was a stone in the shoe of the complacent
and arrogant men running Rangers in the pre liquidation years, his bravery in
calling out sections of the Ibrox support for repeated singing of sectarian
songs irked many among the Ibrox support to a far greater degree. He said in
2004 after sustained abuse of Neil Lennon and Martin O’Neil at Ibrox…
‘From too many mouths to count, people like
O'Neill and Neil Lennon, the Celtic midfielder, both Catholics from Northern
Ireland, were subjected to sustained sectarian abuse throughout the match. It
is worth actually citing these slogans. They ranged from ''Fenian c***'' to
''Fenian scumbag'' to - in the case of Lennon - ''away and f*** yersel, Lennon,
ya Fenian bawbag''.
A
Rangers supporter sitting close to me, and representing that great strand of
decent Ibrox supporters who must be routinely embarrassed by all this, said to
me jocularly at half-time: ''You'll note that we are among the discerning
Rangers supporters up here.'' He was joking, but his sarcasm made the point. It
was a rotten, ignorant, venom-filled atmosphere, which Martin O'Neill, three days
later would quite rightly describe as bigoted.’
Instead of looking carefully at what occurred
that day at Ibrox many Rangers supporters accused Speirs of bias. A fairly hard
claim to sustain given the fact he was a Rangers supporter as a boy. Too few in
the Scottish media backed Martin O’Neil or Graham Spiers at the time. Any
objective Journalist worthy of the name would merely have to look around Ibrox
and listen on such occasions to confirm the poisonous atmosphere. For the most
part they just looked the other way.
Graham Spiers was vocal again about the ‘White underclass’ who brought more
disgrace to Rangers at the 2008 UEFA Cup Final in Manchester. I actually read
on one Rangers site his opinion on this being rubbished on the grounds that
there were only a handful of arrests at the stadium. The writer was clearly
being disingenuous as serious rioting and the worst of the bigoted singing
happened away from the ground. This denial is a constant theme. It’s always, ‘a small minority’ or ‘Groups not normally associated with Rangers.’
There seems to be no will to say, ‘yeh,
we do have a serious problem here, let’s see how we can improve things.’
30 years earlier, Ian Archer had said of
Rangers, ‘They are a permanent embarrassment and an
occasional disgrace. This country would be a better place if Rangers did not
exist." Few of his colleagues in the Scottish
Sporting media had the guts to speak up about the issue and it was left to a
Church of Scotland Minister writing the Church paper ‘The Bush’ to ask what Rangers were going to do about the sectarianism
rife at the club. A generation later Spiers was the lone voice in the
wilderness asking why a modern nation allows this poison to fester. Some who
follow the Ibrox club attack the messenger anytime the subject is raised and
those who write about it are lampooned as ‘Rangers
haters’ or in some way plotting against the club. Nothing could be further
from the truth. Hating bigotry and hating Rangers are not always synonymous and
many Rangers supporters themselves detest the damage these songs do to the club
and its reputation. This is about driving out bigotry and hatred and the decent
fans of all football clubs would support that. The less intelligent groups like
to portray the debate on bigotry in Celtic v Rangers terms, it should instead
be portrayed as the decent fans of all clubs standing up against the morons who
refuse to join the modern world.
In 2011 Spiers
again raised his head above the parapet after the League Cup Final of that year
was the setting for yet another bigoted song fest. He said following that game…
"The incessant bigoted chanting by Rangers fans at Hampden was
shocking. Unarguably they are the most socially-backward fans in British
football. The really damaging thing for RFC is, it’s not the mythical ‘small
minority’. There appear to be 1000s upon 1000s singing these songs."
This stinging
rebuke had some frothing at the mouth and all manner of criticism came Spiers’
way but anyone who attended the game couldn’t fail to hear among other odious
ditties, the ‘Billy Boys,’ ‘No Pope of
Rome’ and the ‘Famine song’ being
sung by thousands of people. The truth it seems was too much for some to
swallow.
This last week Mr
Spiers again raised the singing of bigoted songs at the recent Rangers v Hibs
game. It is undeniable that it took place but what changed was his newspaper,
the Herald, printing an apology after Speirs wrote that one Director of the
club said the ‘Billy Boys’ was a great song and questioned the mettle of the
Rangers Board to tackle offensive chanting. It has been suggested on social
media that one Rangers Director threatened to remove lucrative advertising from
the newspaper if no apology was forthcoming. Whatever the truth of that, Spiers
was clear that his original column had been accurate. He released a statement which
stood by his version of events and basically destroyed any hope he had of
staying with the Herald, it said…
‘I feel I need to explain the context of The Herald
clarification/apology published today regarding my column about Rangers FC and
the fight against bigoted chanting. Rangers took exception to a column I wrote
in which I questioned “the mettle” of the current club board in tackling
offensive chanting. This opinion was based on the fact that, at a meeting I
attended at Ibrox Stadium on August 31st 2015, a Rangers director told me that
he thought The Billy Boys was “a great song”.
I subsequently expressed my dismay at the
director’s comment in an email exchange with Rangers. There was, and is, no
question of me calling any Rangers director a bigot. Rangers duly complained to
The Herald about my column. As the weeks passed a dispute arose, and the
pressure brought upon the newspaper became severe. The Herald told me
repeatedly that they now had to find a way to a public resolution with Rangers.
Having searched many avenues to reach an agreement with the club, the
newspaper ultimately denied my request to withhold any
clarification/apology until my own position was clearer. The Herald has never
told me that they disbelieved my version of events. I also retain the
highest regard for Magnus Llewellin, the paper’s editor who has tried to
resolve this problem. My opinion – as expressed in my column – was based on a
truthful account of my meeting with a Rangers director.’
Such a statement made his
tenure at the Herald untenable and he left their employment as did Angela
Haggarty who supported him. The fact that Rangers IFC threatened to sue over
Spiers’ comments about a Director saying the Billy Boys was ‘a great song’ no
doubt influenced the Herald’s decision. Their denial that major advertising
revenue coming from another Rangers Director was not an issue sounds a little
hollow. It remains astonishing that Angela Haggarty was told her services were
no longer required given the fuss is about an article she didn’t even write. One
can only conclude that the Herald caved in to pressure from Rangers despite
statements to the contrary. It takes guts to back your Reporters and it seems
the Herald had no stomach for the fight and all that entails when you tangle
with that club and ‘the people’ who follow it.
Of course the deniers among
the Rangers support were portraying Spiers as a liar who had been ‘caught out’
printing untruths about Rangers supporters. They simply cannot or will not
grasp that the bigoted chanting at Ibrox is the problem they should be
discussing rather than ‘shooting the
messenger.’ They should take a look in the mirror and actually ask
themselves if the issues Graham Spiers has been raising all these years are
real or not. Their inability to react to criticism with anything other than
anger and counter accusation speak of an immature and insecure mindset.
Graham Spiers is not perfect
and admits to enjoying ‘noising people
up’ from time to time but his motivation with regards to outing the bigots
in Scottish football is based on his belief that it might, in the end, get
through to some of the thickos who pollute the air with their poison. He gave a
clue as to why he meets so much hostility from sections of the Rangers support
when, in a revealing interview with Cardiff University in 2010 he said…
‘I’ve probably gone further in my accusations with
regards Rangers rather than Celtic and that is because I decided to break an
age old rule in Scottish football which said, if you’re writing about football
and you’re writing about bigotry always make one side as bad as the other. That
always struck me as odd. It was obvious to me that Rangers had a far greater
problem, the result of which I was accused of being biased. That was the
unwritten rule. I must have heard it from the age of ten and being football
crazy, in actual fact being a Rangers supporter rather ironically, this always
struck me as odd.’
Despite the way this article
will undoubtedly be perceived by some, it is not an anti- Rangers rant. It is
rather a plea that those who engage in sophistry to try and score petty points
against those they perceive as enemies of Rangers look with honesty at the
club’s historical and current problem with bigotry. Those who ran the club in
the past bear great responsibility for what it became but that was then and
this is now. The late and I would say great Sandy Jardine said at the time of
Maurice Johnston’s signing for Rangers…
"When
I came here in 1964, we had no Catholics. Not just the playing staff, anywhere.
There was no bit of paper, it was an unwritten rule. David Murray changed that
and it moved on significantly in 1989 when Maurice Johnston
signed. You cannot clear up 80 years of sectarianism in eight months, but we
are a huge way down the road."
Jardine was right to say that there
have been great strides made by Rangers in terms of ending the dumb apartheid
of the past. The journey the Rangers support must go on has a way to go yet and
I hope the majority of them have the honesty and integrity to accept that there
are still issues to address. If they want a club that is modern and outward
looking it’s time to leave the bigoted songs and attitudes in the dustbin of
history. Forget about the ‘whataboutery’ and ‘list of enemies’ the people doing
most damage to this club sport it colours and attend its games. It will take
more guts than the Herald displayed for the decent fans at Ibrox to stand up and grab the bull of bigotry by the horns.
I wonder if any of them are ready to do
that?
Spot on Pat.
ReplyDeleteHH
True every word..But were it'll get us nowhere..These Peepul can't be educated cause it's in them from the breast..For years they blamed Religious Bigotry on Catholic Schools.."What Catholic Schools did these peepul go to then..You can't educate Morons
ReplyDeleteGreat article -
ReplyDeleteI couldn't agree more
Spot on bud and the reaction of the herald reflects the appetite to challenge the 'mob' and their associated mentality!
ReplyDeleteWhen the herald, and others like them within the newspaper industry, misplace its faith to appease the reader/baying mob, at the expense of the story and/or journalistic autonomy, the games a bogey. For me, It's the desperate last act of a dying industry, and on the basis of this incident and SMSM reportage of the death of Rangers in general, good riddance!!
If you're not part of the solution you're part of the problem.